Skip to main content

Methodology

How Madini works

From raw satellite data to ranked exploration targets — every step documented, and backed by peer-reviewed methodologies where published methods exist.

01
01

Data Acquisition

The moment you submit your region, we pull satellite imagery from Sentinel-2, ASTER, NASA EMIT hyperspectral, and SRTM elevation — automatically, no manual downloads or preprocessing needed.

  • +Sentinel-2 L2A surface reflectance
  • +ASTER L1T with SWIR crosstalk correction
  • +EMIT L2B mineral abundance products
  • +SRTM 30m elevation + slope + curvature
Data Acquisition
02
02

Spectral Analysis

Band ratios and spectral indices reveal alteration mineralogy invisible on the ground. Iron oxide ratios detect gossans and laterite caps. Hydroxyl indices map clay-sericite-chlorite alteration zones.

  • +Iron oxide (B4/B2) — Rowan et al. 1977
  • +Hydroxyl (B11/B12) — Rowan & Mars 2003
  • +ASTER sericite, chlorite, carbonate indices
  • +EMIT mineral abundance at 2.2–2.5 µm
Spectral Analysis
03
03

Structural Analysis

Structural features extracted automatically from elevation data. Multi-azimuth hillshade highlights lineaments, edge detection maps discontinuities, and curvature analysis identifies structurally complex zones.

  • +8-direction hillshade (Horn 1981)
  • +Sobel edge detection for lineaments
  • +Slope variability analysis
  • +Laplacian curvature at native 30m
Structural Analysis
04
04

Evidence Integration

All evidence layers combined using deposit-model-specific weights — a knowledge-driven ensemble of weighted linear combination and fuzzy logic. The weights come from the published deposit-model literature, not from training on your region.

  • +6–7 deposit models per commodity, literature-derived weights
  • +Weighted linear combination + fuzzy logic
  • +Percentile classification (P70/P80/P90/P95)
  • +ML enhancement exists but is not part of a standard analysis
Evidence Integration
05
05

Target Generation

High-prospectivity zones delineated into ranked exploration targets. Model–method agreement expresses how closely the separately computed deposit-model and integration-method estimates coincide. Those estimates share input evidence layers, so agreement among near-identical estimators is a property of the method, not a second opinion about the ground. It is not the probability that mineralisation is present.

  • +Priority-ranked target polygons
  • +Model–method agreement: how closely the model and method estimates coincided — not a probability
  • +Contributing factor breakdown
  • +Downloadable GeoJSON coordinates
Target Generation
06
06

Deliverables

Results packaged in formats your team already uses. Interactive web maps for immediate exploration. Publication-grade PDF reports for stakeholders. GeoTIFF rasters and GeoJSON target polygons for your GIS.

  • +Interactive prospectivity web map
  • +PDF scientific whitepaper (15-20 pages)
  • +Multi-band GeoTIFF rasters
  • +GeoJSON exploration targets
Deliverables

Peer-Reviewed References

Our methodology is built on established remote sensing science. Key references with DOI links:

  1. Rowan, L.C., Goetz, A.F.H., & Ashley, R.P. (1977). Discrimination of hydrothermally altered and unaltered rocks in visible and near-infrared multispectral images. Geophysics, 42(3), 522–535. DOI
  2. Rowan, L.C. & Mars, J.C. (2003). Lithologic mapping in the Mountain Pass, California area using Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84(3), 350–366. DOI
  3. Ninomiya, Y., Fu, B., & Cudahy, T.J. (2005). Detecting lithology with Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) multispectral thermal infrared "radiance-at-sensor" data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 99(1-2), 127–139. DOI
  4. Iwasaki, A. & Tonooka, H. (2005). Validation of a crosstalk correction algorithm for ASTER/SWIR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(12), 2747–2751. Cited as background only: the ASTER SWIR crosstalk correction applied in this analysis is an in-house approximation of unverified fidelity, not an implementation of this paper’s algorithm or coefficients. DOI
  5. Horn, B.K.P. (1981). Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 69(1), 14–47. DOI

Last updated: April 13, 2026

Ready to see it in action?

Create your account and submit your first analysis request.